The change
Qedix by Qohere · Free public beta
Production-safety
evidence before merge.
Qedix reviews production-sensitive JavaScript and TypeScript pull requests and presents evidence-based production readiness findings—what safety evidence exists, what is missing, and where maintainer review is required before merge.
- Advisory by default
- JavaScript and TypeScript PRs
- Maintainers make the final decision
qedix / pull-request-482
changed src/api/orders/route.ts
review Make order creation atomic
observed request schema validation
not proven atomic transaction boundary
review failure-path verification
Evidence is advisory · Maintainer decides
Evidence-based production readiness
Production readiness for pull requests—not just a green pipeline.
Tests, type checking, linting, and security tools remain essential. Qedix adds an automated production readiness review for JavaScript and TypeScript pull requests, showing production-safety evidence, missing proof, and the controls maintainers should verify before a safe merge.
The control
Which safety control should be visible?
The decision
What still needs maintainer judgment?
How it works
Connect once. Review every supported pull request with fresh evidence.
- 01
Connect selected repositories
Install the Qedix GitHub App only on repositories your team wants reviewed.
- 02
Open or update a pull request
Qedix reviews supported JavaScript and TypeScript changes in the pull request.
- 03
Review evidence before merge
See visible evidence, missing proof, and the areas that need maintainer judgment.
Evidence, not a mystery score
Three states keep the decision explainable.
Relevant safety evidence is visible in the pull-request context.
Not enough visible evidence supports the expected control.
Application-specific context or maintainer judgment is required.
Production-sensitive coverage
Focused review for changes that can fail beyond CI.
Authorization
Access checks, roles, permissions, ownership, and protected operations.
Authentication
Sessions, tokens, identity verification, and authentication boundaries.
Request validation
Schema and input-validation evidence around changed request paths.
Webhook safety
Signatures, replay handling, deduplication, and side-effect ordering.
Payment paths
Amounts, entitlements, provider events, and sensitive payment behaviour.
Database integrity
Destructive writes, transaction scope, mutations, and consistency.
Tenant isolation
Organization, workspace, owner, and tenant scope on reads and writes.
Secrets and errors
Credentials, sensitive values, internal errors, and unsafe logging.
Caching and deployment
Invalidation, migrations, dependencies, builds, and deployment risk.
Coverage descriptions are product guidance, not a guarantee that every defect or vulnerability will be detected.
Clear product boundaries
Designed to strengthen review—not replace engineering judgment.
Advisory by design
Qedix does not approve, merge, deploy, or make the final release decision.
No guarantee from a clean result
Static pull-request analysis cannot prove that software is secure or defect-free.
Suggestions are not executed tests
A recommended test does not mean Qedix ran your application or test suite.
Context still matters
Runtime configuration and application-specific behaviour can require separate verification.
Free during public beta
Add production-safety evidence to your next pull request.
No beta access request or paid subscription is currently required.